The Psychology of Homesickness for Adults


Updated on 25 Aug 2025

Written by the Psychvarsity Team

 

When Distance Primes Attachment Systems in Adults

 

Any adult who has stepped off a plane into a new city knows the sensation: the chest tightness at night, the way meals feel oddly tasteless eaten alone, and the irrational urge to message someone “back home” just to hear a familiar cadence. Homesickness intensifies after mundane losses — the local bakery, a particular light at 5 p.m., the neighbour’s laugh — because proximity to attachment figures and predictable routines silently regulates stress (Bowlby, 1969; Beckes and Coan, 2011). When those anchors vanish, the nervous system reads threat where the calendar merely reads “Tuesday”.

Mechanistically, homesickness in adults reflects the reactivation of attachment-seeking coupled with altered threat appraisal. Attachment theory predicts proximity-seeking and protest when separation cues are strong; adults are not exempt from this circuitry (Bowlby, 1969; Mikulincer and Shaver, 2016). Social baseline theory adds that the brain expects co-regulation by close others to conserve energy; without it, tasks feel harder and risks loom larger (Beckes and Coan, 2011). The result is heightened vigilance, somatic unease, and preoccupation with home as a psychological safe base.

Case vignette: “Leila”, 39, a senior physiotherapist relocating from Manchester to Bristol for a specialist role, notices mounting irritability and Sunday-night dread by week three. The emotional pivot comes after a double shift when she realises she has not eaten with another person for 12 days. Brief intervention: a structured plan to increase predictable social contact (two dinners with colleagues over six weeks), scheduled video calls with her sister every Wednesday, and a bedtime ritual using a familiar playlist to cue safety. Outcome: within eight weeks, sleep latency shortens from ~60 minutes to ~25 minutes, and she reports fewer “urge to quit” days, consistent with the notion that attachment-consistent routines lower perceived threat (Mikulincer and Shaver, 2016).

Implications: employers can build early, repeated touchpoints that imitate a secure base; couples living apart might use consistent temporal signals (same-time, same-length calls) to stabilise arousal; new residents can reproduce sensory cues (smell, sound) to increase felt safety; clinicians can normalise attachment protest as an expectable response to separation rather than pathology.

Counterpoint: attachment activation does not explain every profile. For some, the drive is less about people and more about place-based identity or lost routines; person–environment fit and place attachment provide additional explanatory power (Scannell and Gifford, 2010).

 

Threat Appraisal, Loss of Control, and the Stress Loop

 

A common pattern in adult homesickness is a cognitive spiral: minor hassles feel like stacked bricks — the malfunctioning thermostat, a misread bus timetable — and suddenly the mind whispers, “This was a mistake.” Such moments are less about the bus and more about perceived loss of control and resources.

According to transactional stress theory, emotional strain hinges on how individuals appraise demands versus coping resources, and whether events feel controllable (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984). Relocation disrupts routines that previously ran on “autopilot”, reducing perceived efficacy. Conservation of resources theory adds that relocation begins with resource loss (time, status, social capital), and loss tends to beget further loss if not interrupted (Hobfoll, 2018). Homesickness thus becomes a stress amplifier: attention narrows to cues of inadequacy, while avoidance reduces opportunities to rebuild resources.

Case vignette: “Nikhil”, 28, an early-career data analyst moving from Bangalore to Dublin, finds himself second-guessing simple decisions by week two. The pivot occurs when he misses a project deadline after spending hours searching for a familiar brand of rice across the city. Brief intervention across six weeks: a two-column appraisal diary (controllable vs. uncontrollable), problem-focused coping where efficacy is high (learning the transport app), and emotion-focused coping where control is low (guided breathing before calls). Outcome: his daily stress rating drops from 8/10 to 5/10, and he submits two reports on time, reflecting improved primary and secondary appraisals (Lazarus and Folkman, 1984).

Implications: managers can scaffold controllability by clarifying norms and offering choice; newcomers can explicitly categorise hassles by control to prevent wasted effort; couples and families can pre-commit to decision rules (e.g., “good enough” groceries for four weeks) to avoid resource-draining perfectionism; community groups can post simple “first 10 days” guides to reduce decision fatigue.

Boundary condition: for some, resource gains (higher salary, better housing) blunt homesickness despite distance; the resource substitution effect suggests that particular gains can offset some losses, though not uniformly across individuals (Hobfoll, 2018).

 

Exploring the emotional journey of feeling homesick as an adult.
Exploring the emotional journey of feeling homesick as an adult.

 

 

The Pull of Places: How Environmental Cues Carry Memory and Meaning

 

People rarely miss “home” in the abstract; they miss the street that smelt of rain after 6 p.m., the coffee mug chipped on the rim, the route where their feet knew every crack. The environment acts as a cognitive map tied to identity, and when that map is torn, orientation suffers.

Place attachment research shows that bonds to places are multidimensional — person–place–process — involving affect, cognition, and behaviour (Scannell and Gifford, 2010). Environmental cues become retrieval hooks for autobiographical memory; removing these hooks reduces fluency in daily life, which the brain can misread as danger. Predictive processing accounts further suggest that stable cues allow the brain to minimise prediction error; a new city floods the system with surprises, increasing arousal and fatigue until new regularities are learned (Barrett and Simmons, 2015).

Case vignette: “Ana”, 33, a secondary school teacher who moved from Porto to Leeds, feels oddly “clumsy” navigating her days. The emotional pivot arrives after getting lost twice walking home from school. Brief intervention: for six weeks she traces one walkable route at the same time daily, adds a Portuguese radio station to her morning routine, and arranges her kitchen to mimic the layout of her old flat. Outcome: by week eight she reports fewer “blank moments” at work and notes that the evening walk feels “automatic”, signalling new cue–routine associations.

Implications: urban planners and employers welcoming newcomers might design “first 30 days” cue consistency (clear wayfinding, predictable schedules); individuals can replicate micro-layouts from previous homes; carers can validate the cognitive drag of learning new spatial schemas; therapists may use guided imagery that reinstates sensory anchors to stabilise affect.

Counterpoint: strong place attachment is not always beneficial. In contexts of forced migration or unsafe neighbourhoods, loosening ties may protect wellbeing; the adaptiveness of place bonding depends on safety and choice (Scannell and Gifford, 2010).

 

Nostalgia as a Psychological Resource—When Longing Heals and When It Hurts

 

On solitary evenings, many adults reach for photos or old playlists. The ache softens. Conversations feel closer. This is not mere sentimentality. Laboratory and field studies suggest that nostalgia can increase feelings of social connectedness, self-continuity, and meaning — precisely the resources depleted by homesickness (Wildschut et al., 2006; Routledge et al., 2011).

Nostalgia functions as an emotion regulation strategy: it recruits warm, self-relevant memories that counteract loneliness and bolster valued identities (Wildschut et al., 2006). In homesickness, these memories remind the self of who it has been, which stabilises predictions about who it can be in a new setting. Meaning-making frameworks further show that such recollection can rebuild global meaning when situational meaning (new city, unfamiliar norms) clashes with prior assumptions (Park, 2010).

Case vignette: “Marcus”, 45, a project manager on a 10-week secondment in Rotterdam, begins to dread weekends. The pivot occurs after he realises he has stopped cooking entirely. Brief, structured nostalgia: he chooses one recipe from Sundays at his grandmother’s, plays the same Motown record, and messages two cousins during the meal. Over eight weeks, he reports the weekend sadness dropping from “crushing” to “heavy but manageable”, and he resumes gym visits twice weekly. The practice appears to harness nostalgia’s prosocial and self-affirming effects (Routledge et al., 2011).

Practical implications: use time-limited, sensory-rich nostalgia rituals (music, scent) to replenish connection; share stories with trusted others to turn private longing into communal meaning; link nostalgia to approach behaviour (invite, plan, create) rather than passive scrolling; teams can open meetings with “what grounds me” shares to build cohesion when dispersed.

Caveat: nostalgia can tip into rumination for those prone to depressive thinking; repetitive, unconstructive dwelling is associated with prolonged negative mood (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 2008). Framing matters — nostalgia in the service of connection and action tends to help, whereas nostalgic avoidance can sustain homesickness.

 

Understanding how homesickness can affect our daily lives.
Understanding how homesickness can affect our daily lives.

 

 

Crossing Cultures, Carrying Selves: Acculturative Stress and Role Transitions

 

An engineer thrives in Lagos but freezes during small talk in Oslo. A nurse excels clinically yet misreads humour in Melbourne. Homesickness often flares at the interface of cultural scripts and professional identity: the person knows their craft, yet the social codebooks feel scrambled.

Acculturation research maps how individuals adapt to new cultural contexts through strategies like integration, assimilation, separation, or marginalisation, each with distinct wellbeing profiles (Berry, 2005). Residential mobility itself can unsettle social ties and trust, particularly early on (Oishi, 2010). Expatriate studies show that unmet expectations and misaligned support structures amplify homesickness and reduce adjustment (Hack-Polay, 2012). When roles shift simultaneously — new country, new job, new language — cognitive load and identity threat multiply.

Case vignette: “Sofia”, 31, a paediatric nurse from Madrid relocating to a London teaching hospital, feels competent at the bedside but unsure during handover banter. By week four she contemplates returning home. Brief intervention across 10 weeks: targeted cultural onboarding (shadowing one senior nurse noted for team humour), a peer buddy outside her unit, and a personal values exercise to anchor identity during ambiguity. Outcome: she reports higher team belonging and fewer withdrawal thoughts by week 10, consistent with evidence that integration — maintaining original identity while engaging the new culture — yields better adaptation (Berry, 2005; Hack-Polay, 2012).

Applications: organisations can provide explicit cultural scripts (“how we ask for help here”), not just technical induction; mentors can model pragmatic code-switching; individuals can preserve core rituals from home while experimenting with low-risk local practices; families can pre-negotiate which customs to retain to stabilise identity during the move.

Boundary condition: integration is not always feasible; structural barriers and discrimination can constrain options, and in such contexts, separation or alternating strategies may temporarily protect wellbeing (Berry, 2005).

 

Routines, Sleep, and Agency: Building Micro-Habit Scaffolds for Stability

 

After a move, the smallest decisions swell: which supermarket, when to shower, whether to run. Decision fatigue steals colour from the day, and evenings stretch. Underneath, circadian rhythms may be adrift, amplifying emotional volatility and making homesickness harder to shake.

Emotion regulation models emphasise that structured strategies — situation selection, attentional deployment, cognitive change, response modulation — can reduce distress when applied flexibly (Gross, 2015). Behavioural activation adds that planned, valued activities can interrupt avoidance and restore reward sensitivity (Martell, Addis and Jacobson, 2001). Sleep science indicates that curtailed or irregular sleep degrades prefrontal control over amygdala reactivity, increasing anxiety and sadness (Goldstein and Walker, 2014). Self-determination theory suggests that even micro-habits that support autonomy, competence, and relatedness can rebuild vitality (Deci and Ryan, 2000).

Case vignette: “Tariq”, 27, a postgraduate student in Edinburgh, reports 2 a.m. bedtimes and skipping breakfast, with mounting homesick thoughts. Brief six-week plan: fixed “anchor” wake time, outdoor light within 30 minutes of waking, two pre-planned social micro-tasks per week (text invitation + 20-minute coffee), and one weekly mastery task (learn a new bus route). By week seven, sleep regularity improves and his mood chart shows fewer late-night dips, consistent with improved emotion regulation and restored routine reward (Gross, 2015; Goldstein and Walker, 2014).

Practical implications: set one or two non-negotiable anchors (wake time, movement, dinner hour); schedule social contact before mood drops; use environments that nudge behaviour (keep walking shoes by the door); pair nostalgia with approach tasks (call while walking to a new café) to avoid stasis.

Note of caution: rigid routines can backfire if they crowd out exploration; flexibility and values-congruence matter more than sheer structure (Deci and Ryan, 2000).

 

Finding comfort in memories of home during tough times.
Finding comfort in memories of home during tough times.

 

 

Social Architecture at Work and University: Buffering Homesickness through Design

 

New hires and freshers frequently arrive with a silent burden: leaving behind an entire web of known faces. In the first month, a well-timed lunch invitation can matter as much as a training manual. Without such scaffolding, capable adults can drift to the edges and long for home with surprising intensity.

Social support acts as both a main effect and a stress buffer; perceived availability of support mitigates the impact of stressors on wellbeing (Cohen and Wills, 1985). Organisational socialisation research shows that structured onboarding — role clarity, social integration, and feedback — predicts better adjustment and lower turnover (Bauer et al., 2007). Group-level factors, such as collective efficacy, also influence whether newcomers feel their efforts matter, which can counteract helplessness linked to homesickness (Bandura, 2000).

Case vignette: “Ewan”, 24, a graduate software developer in his first role in Cardiff, eats alone for nine consecutive workdays and contemplates moving back to his hometown. The pivot: a team lead notices and pairs him with a “learning buddy” for code reviews and a fortnightly tea. Over the next 10 weeks, he reports greater belonging, attends one community meetup, and decides to stay through his six-month probation. The structured contact echoes findings on the buffering role of support and role clarity (Bauer et al., 2007; Cohen and Wills, 1985).

Applications: teams can implement “first 30 days” calendars with named contacts; universities can create opt-in “home-from-home” common rooms organised by interest rather than nationality; leaders can signal norms of asking for help; peer mentors can be trained to detect subtle withdrawal and initiate small, non-intrusive engagements.

Boundary condition: not all support feels supportive. Mismatched or overbearing help can undermine autonomy and ironically intensify withdrawal; autonomy-supportive practices mitigate this risk (Deci and Ryan, 2000).

 

Screens as Bridges and Barriers: Digital Contact, Proximity, and Mood

 

A midnight video call can transform a flat into a temporary lounge back home. Yet the same device can seed comparisons and FOMO when friends post gatherings one cannot attend. For adults managing homesickness, technology is both balm and irritant.

Media multiplexity theory suggests that stronger ties use more communication channels, and multichannel contact can maintain closeness across distance (Haythornthwaite, 2005). Studies of migrants indicate that social media contact with home networks can bolster support and adjustment when used actively and relationally (Billedo, Kerkhof and Finkenauer, 2017). However, passive browsing of others’ highlights correlates with lower wellbeing, likely via social comparison and reduced offline engagement (Verduyn et al., 2017).

Case vignette: “Grace”, 36, a chartered surveyor on a nine-month project in Singapore, feels uplifted after family voice notes but deflated after scrolling through weekend photos from London. Brief six-week tweak: schedule two active check-ins per week (voice or video), cap passive scrolling to 10 minutes nightly, and redirect urges to scroll into sending a photo from her day. Outcome: she reports feeling “more in” both cities and notices fewer pangs after bedtime, aligning with evidence that active, purposeful communication fosters connectedness (Billedo, Kerkhof and Finkenauer, 2017; Verduyn et al., 2017).

Applications: choose richer media (voice, video) for core ties; set gentle boundaries for passive feeds; share “small moments” to create mutual presence; workplaces can signal time-zone etiquette to reduce midnight obligations; families can create predictable “drop-in” windows to reduce missed-call guilt.

Limit: digital contact cannot fully substitute embodied co-presence; some regulatory benefits of touch and shared space are uniquely physical (Beckes and Coan, 2011).

 

Navigating the challenges of longing for familiar places.
Navigating the challenges of longing for familiar places.

 

 

Making Sense of Longing: Narrative, Meaning, and Identity Continuity

 

Homesickness often peaks when people cannot explain to themselves why they are where they are. The story breaks. Without a credible bridge between past and present, longing turns from a signal into a swamp.

Meaning-making models propose that distress arises when situational meaning conflicts with global beliefs or goals; adaptation hinges on reconciling the two through accommodation or assimilation (Park, 2010). Narrative identity research adds that adults sustain a sense of self via evolving life stories that integrate high and low points into a coherent arc (McAdams and McLean, 2013). Constructing a “home-in-transition” narrative can resituate the move as chapter rather than rupture.

Case vignette: “Peter”, 52, a university administrator who moved from Belfast to Glasgow after redundancy, feels ashamed of “starting over”. The pivot occurs during a brief guided writing task exploring “why this move might serve my long-term values”. Over 10 weeks, he meets fortnightly with a peer group, crafts a small mentoring role at the new institution, and reframes the relocation as protecting family stability and mentoring legacy. Mood lifts modestly, and he reports fewer self-critical spirals, echoing findings that coherent narratives and value alignment support adjustment (Park, 2010; McAdams and McLean, 2013).

Applications: use reflective writing to connect the move with enduring values; curate an “identity board” of roles that travel (parent, mentor, musician); seek roles that preserve continuity (volunteer, faith, sport); teams can invite newcomers’ origin stories to honour existing identities.

Counterpoint: for those facing ongoing uncertainty or injustice, narrative reframing alone may feel hollow; material conditions and fair treatment remain central to sustainable adaptation (Berry, 2005).

 

Grief’s Quiet Cousin: Differentiating Homesickness from Depression and Anxiety

 

An adult might say, “I miss home,” but the presentation varies. For some, it is a tender ache that ebbs with contact; for others, sleep, appetite, and concentration fray. Differentiating homesickness from emerging depression or anxiety helps right-size support and prevents neglect of more urgent needs.

Homesickness shares features with separation-related distress and grief — yearning, preoccupation, tearfulness — but typically fluctuates with contact, routine, and time as new schemas form (Stroebe et al., 2002). Chronic, pervasive low mood, anhedonia, marked functional impairment, or persistent hyperarousal may indicate depressive or anxiety disorders requiring assessment. Emotion regulation and social baseline accounts help explain why co-regulation and routine often relieve homesickness more than abstract reassurance (Beckes and Coan, 2011; Gross, 2015).

Case vignette: “Hannah”, 29, a trainee solicitor moving from Bristol to London, has two weeks of pronounced tearfulness at night that ease after joining a midweek choir. The pivot is positive contact; by week eight, symptoms are intermittent and context-linked. Brief supports: predictable social rituals, sleep anchors, and scheduled calls. By contrast, her colleague “Ravi” reports six weeks of persistent early-morning waking, loss of interest in previously enjoyed activities, and impaired performance; he benefits from a clinical evaluation and stepped-care support.

Implications: organisations can train line managers to notice patterns that persist across contexts; universities can publicise pathways for assessment without stigma; individuals can monitor duration, intensity, and breadth of impact to guide help-seeking; families can validate longing while keeping an eye on functioning.

Boundary caution: short screening cannot replace thorough clinical assessment; cultural idioms of distress may shape expression and help-seeking patterns, requiring culturally informed interpretation (Berry, 2005).

 

Embracing the feelings of homesickness as part of life’s journey.
Embracing the feelings of homesickness as part of life’s journey.

 

 

References

 

(2015) 'Supplemental Material for Homesickness: A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature', Review of General Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000037.supp

Beckes, L., Coan, J.A. (2011) 'Social Baseline Theory: The Role of Social Proximity in Emotion and Economy of Action', Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(12), 976-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00400.x

Deng, Z., Qiu, Y., Xiao, X., Jiao, C. (2024) 'Elderly’s Homesickness: Development of Elderly Homesickness Questionnaire', Psychology Research and Behavior Management, Volume 17, 1533-1549. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s451960

Emery-Tiburcio, E.E., Rothschild, S.K., Avery, E.F., Wang, Y., Mack, L., Golden, R.L., Holmgreen, L., Hobfoll, S., Richardson, D., Powell, L.H. (2019) 'BRIGHTEN Heart intervention for depression in minority older adults: Randomized controlled trial.', Health Psychology, 38(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000684

Fisher, S., Murray, K., Frazer, N.A. (1985) 'Homesickness, health and efficiency in first year students', Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5(2), 181-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(85)80016-5

Folkman, S., Lazarus, R.S. (1985) 'Stress Questionnaire', PsycTESTS Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06129-000

Goldstein, A.N., Walker, M.P. (2014) 'The Role of Sleep in Emotional Brain Function', Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 679-708. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153716

Hack-Polay, D. (2012) 'When Home Isn’t Home – A Study of Homesickness and Coping Strategies among Migrant Workers and Expatriates', International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v4n3p62

Ireland, C., Archer, J. (2000) 'Homesickness amongst a prison population', Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5(1), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532500168001

McAdams, D.P., McLean, K.C. (2013) 'Narrative Identity', Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413475622

Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P.R. (null) 'Attachment Theory', Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 160-179. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n34

Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L. (2000) 'Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions', Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Scannell, L., Gifford, R. (2010) 'Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework', Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006

Thurber, C.A. (2005) 'Multimodal Homesickness Prevention in Boys Spending 2 Weeks at a Residential Summer Camp.', Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 555-560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.73.3.555

 

Related Topics

Want to share this article?

What do you think?

Comments